On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:25:35PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:10:30PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > index 6ed45a984230..1191aa47adc9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > > @@ -2347,7 +2347,7 @@ static int pipe_crc_set_source(struct drm_device *dev, enum pipe pipe,
> > > {
> > > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> > > struct intel_pipe_crc *pipe_crc = &dev_priv->pipe_crc[pipe];
> > > - u32 val;
> > > + u32 val = 0; /* shut up gcc */
> >
> > Wouldn't it be better to use uninitialized_var() here?
>
> I remember Linus' rant about this macro so that's why I don't use it
> anymore.
>
> In this specific case, it doesn't matter whichever we do so I'll let the
> maintainer make a wish :)
IIRC this warning was there for me too on gcc 4.6, but it disappeared
on gcc 4.7, which is why I decided not to send a patch for it.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
