On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 09:08:44AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 03:01:03PM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 11:02:25PM +0200, ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > All the other .enable_fbc() funcs use plane_name(). Make > > > gen7_enable_fbc() do the same. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I've picked up a few of the reviewed patches here. Overall we still have > the issue that enabling the fbc tracking totally wreaks havoc with the > blitter performance on gen6+ ... I still think the way to fix that is to > do s/w based tracking and forgo all the neat hw support. For the record, I noticed that FBC was enabled on Haswell because of the dramatic impact it had on RENDER performance... -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
