Re: kernel 3.11.6 general protection fault

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 05:45:18PM +0100, MPhil. Emanoil Kotsev wrote:
> How - new libraries - more exhaustive algorythms - higher cpu usage
> etc. Some of the things M$ is doing on purpose to force you upgrade
> your hardware every 2-3years

That would be too easy and machines would be dying left and right of
overheating. Actually, sane hardware is much more robust than that and
it throttles itself in case of critical temperature levels. And, IMHO
your Dell Latitude D520 should be fine, in that respect. But we'll see.
:-)

> I wanted to first compile the kernel with the debug option you
> mentioned, but while compiling it went to about 75°C.

Yeah, that's still ok if we trust the output saying that 126°C is the
critical temp.

It would be interesting to see what this sensor says right before the
machine locks up.

HTH.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux