Ian Romanick <idr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick@xxxxxxxxx> > > The drm_intel_context structure is, wisely, opaque. However, libdrm > users may want to know the hardware context ID associated with the > structure. We've had a bunch of our other structures be partially transparent. The context id to be passed to the kernel could easily be public just like the gem handle in a BO is public. I would lean slightly toward that. But I don't feel strongly either way, so these two are: Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
Attachment:
pgpTMJdGnPawz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
