Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] drm/i915: Baytrail MIPI DSI support Updated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/11/2013 02:20 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 11:28:16AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 03:19:01PM +0530, Shobhit Kumar wrote:
Hi All -
These patches enhance the current support for MIPI DSI for Baytrail. They
continue on the sub-encoder design and adds few more dev_ops to handle
sequence correctly. Major changes are -

1. DSI Clock calculation based on pixel clock
2. Add new dev_ops for better sequencing the enable/disable path
3. Parameterized the hardcoded DSI parameters. These also forms building
    block for the generic MIPI driver to come in future based on enhancements
    in VBT. All these parameters are initialized or computed in the sub-encoder
    driver. Some of them might look unneccesary for now.

  I am also aware of the drm_bridge support now comming in and will in future
  migrate from sub-encoder design to drm_bridge.

Just a quick aside: Thierry Reding from nvidia is also working on a DSI
design for the tegra driver. Atm he seems to aim for a full-blown DSI bus
based on his drm_panel patches for getting the panel metadata out of an
ARM DT (we'd use VBT instead). Iirc there's no patches anywhere yet, but
maybe Thierry could share a git branch somewhere with the wip stuff?

Cc'ing Thierry and dri-devel in case a bigger discussion develops.

I've been cleaning up the patches and was going to post them today. The
implementation really isn't as "full-blown" as you make it sound =),
primarily because the DSI panel that I have doesn't support things such
as reading out the DDB, so I cannot test most of the functionality that
I planned to.

However I think introducing a DSI bus type is the right thing and it's
been suggested recently that we have too few bus types. Furthermore it
seems to be playing out rather nicely with the DRM panel work, so it
would be really nice if Intel could test-drive this within their driver
to see if it's good enough for their purposes as well.

Interesting. Would be nice to have a look.


Is everyone working on that subscribed to dri-devel or should I Cc the
intel-gfx mailing list (or someone in particular) when posting the
patches?


Will keep an eye for your patches in dri-devel.

Regards
Shobhit

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux