We are currently using ARRAY_SIZE() to iterate address ranges in
intel_dmc_wl_check_range(). In upcoming changes, we will be using more
than a single table and will extract the range checking logic into a
dedicated function that takes a range table as argument. As we will not
able to use ARRAY_SIZE() then, let's make range tables contain a
sentinel item at the end and use that instead of having to pass the size
as parameter in this future function.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
index 5ed610c9be39..82eb9166e5f8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dmc_wl.c
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ struct intel_dmc_wl_range {
static struct intel_dmc_wl_range lnl_wl_range[] = {
{ .start = 0x60000, .end = 0x7ffff },
+ {},
};
static void __intel_dmc_wl_release(struct intel_display *display)
@@ -99,7 +100,7 @@ static bool intel_dmc_wl_check_range(u32 address)
int i;
bool wl_needed = false;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(lnl_wl_range); i++) {
+ for (i = 0; lnl_wl_range[i].start; i++) {
if (address >= lnl_wl_range[i].start &&
address <= lnl_wl_range[i].end) {
wl_needed = true;
--
2.47.0
