On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > @@ -63,7 +65,7 @@ static void exec(int fd, uint32_t handle, uint32_t offset) >> > gem_exec[0].relocs_ptr = (uintptr_t) gem_reloc; >> > gem_exec[0].alignment = 0; >> > gem_exec[0].offset = 0; >> > - gem_exec[0].flags = 0; >> > + gem_exec[0].flags = LOCAL__EXEC_OBJ_NEEDS_GTT; >> >> This only really works with the aliasing ppgtt stuff on gen6, I'd just >> skip the test -it's not really useful with real ppgtt. >> -Daniel > > It is really useful with real ppgtt. Please rethink your assertion. The test links up the global gtt used by the current pin ioctl with the ppgtt. That's not useful, except when they alias. If we want soft-pinning, then we need a new ioctl mode to return the right address from the right address space. Which means a new (sub)test. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
