Re: [PATCH] tests/gem_reloc_overflow: Add gen8+ specifc tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 02:05:55PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Cool, thanks for testing. Since I'm paranoid about this I've added an
> assert into the relevant fixture block to make sure the batch would really
> work safe for the condition we're testing. That way we're maximally robust
> against kernel changes that move the tests around.
> 
> Also fixed some compile warnings in a follow-up.
> 
> Thanks for your patch, applied to i-g-t.

Meh, I've been a bit too quick, two important fixups where needed:
- Make the subtest enumeration work (it's supposed to work without an
  intel gpu present, e.g. for central build/test servers).
- Always enumerate all subtests (again to facilitate testing across
  platforms).

Maybe we need some docs about this stuff, currently most of it is encoded
as runtime asserts in the test suite library.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux