Re: [PATCH] gem_pin: Be explicit about GGTT needs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 08:05:02PM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> This test assumes that using gem_pin will pin in the same address space
> used by execbuf. Since pin is for the global GTT only, use the existing
> flag to notify i915.ko that the exec object is special.

Interesting. Yes, I think you are right, the flag is required for the
test to be correct with full-ppgtt.
 
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux