>>>>>> Thank you, here's what I get: >>>>>> >>>>>> # addr2line -e /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/intel_drv.so -i 0x2fe79 0x3037f > > Grant - I'm assuming that this was done on the emerged > xf86-video-intel, not the git-compiled one? Yes, that is correct. I emerged the git-compiled one too with a -9999 ebuild from the x11 overlay but that was replaced a week ago. >>>>>> /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.905-r1/work/xf86-video-intel-2.99.905/src/sna/sna_accel.c:6079 > > git blame shows sna_accel.c:6079 (as of the 2.99.905 tag) last touched > by 85fdc314 > >>>>>> /var/tmp/portage/x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.905-r1/work/xf86-video-intel-2.99.905/src/sna/sna_accel.c:6240 > > git blame shows sna_accel.c:6240 (as of the 2.99.905 tag) last touched > by 07a46333 > > Also note that xf86-video-intel-2.99.905-r1 has a backport patch of > 8e44b1f5543f6d36c33c743f1ba2143514f8afbf (sna: Fix canonical mode name > to correctly use asprintf) applied that touches sna/sna_display.c I actually just emerged xf86-video-intel-2.99.905-r1 for the first time today, I'd been using 2.99.905. It sounds like that might fix it? - Grant >>>>> I need to know what commit id that corresponds to as well. Thanks, >>>>> -Chris >>>> >>>> I'm sorry Chris, I'm just a lowly user. How can I get that info for you? >>> >>> I happen to have a few Gentoo systems sitting under my desk - if you >>> can send me the output of >>> >>> emerge -pv xf86-video-intel >>> >>> I can assist with backtracking that to a specific commit. >>> >>> -James >> >> Many thanks James! >> >> # emerge -pv xf86-video-intel >> These are the packages that would be merged, in order: >> Calculating dependencies... done! >> [ebuild R ~] x11-drivers/xf86-video-intel-2.99.905-r1 USE="dri >> sna udev -glamor -uxa -xvmc" 0 kB >> Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 kB >> >> - Grant _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
