Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Restore rps/rc6 on reset

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Jani Nikula
<jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I was instructed to keep the JIRA issue codes on the patch, but have
>> to wonder why I don't see any of these in the history. Let me know if
>> those shouldn't be there.
>
> Personally I don't think references to internal systems provide much
> value, though others may disagree. In any case the commit message has to
> be self sufficient without the referenced info. (And no complaints about
> that in your patch!)

Yeah, if crucial information is hidden behind internal references
that's not great. And I think for that reason such stuff is a bit
frowned upon. But if it helps you to keep track of the patches I don't
mind. I think the usual approach though is to smash a Changeset-Id:
tag onto the patch and use that to track the patch flow.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux