On Mon, 2013-10-28 at 15:41 -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> 2013/10/27 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 05:50:18PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >> 2013/10/25 Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > The only real need for this field was in
> >> > i915_{request,release}_power_well, but there we can get at it by a
> >> > container_of magic. Also since in the future we'll have multiple power
> >> > wells each with its own power_well struct it makes sense to remove the
> >> > field from there where it'd be just redundancy.
> >> >
> >> > Suggested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> My original idea was to just move it from i915_power_well to
> >> i915_power_domains, so hsw_pwr (which is the new external static
> >> thing) would still have a pointer to our driver. This way we wouldn't
> >> need the container_of magic. But your solution works too, and saves
> >> 4/8 bytes :)
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > First 3 patches merged, thanks.
>
> I just realized that at some point we accidentally killed the
> i915.disable_power_well option... I see the i915_disable_power_well
> variable is not being used anywhere. Imre, can you please investigate
> that?
Yep, that got removed by mistake in
commit 6efdf354ddb186c6604d1692075421e8d2c740e9
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed Oct 16 17:25:52 2013 +0300
drm/i915: enable only the needed power domains during modeset
I'll follow up with a fix.
--Imre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
