On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:36:30AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 02:04:34PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 08:37:44PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 12:07:26PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 01:02:53PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > > If we force the hw to idle as our first step during unload, we can abort > > > > > the unload upon failure. Later we can probe whether the hardware remain > > > > > active even after we try to shut it down. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > Isn't it pretty mean to fail to unload? Wouldn't pci_clear_master yield > > > > what we want? > > > > > > It may be mean, but it seems to me to be the right thing to do if we > > > cannot turn off the hardware to unload the driver... > > > -Chris > > > > > > -- > > > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre > > > > And what about my suggestion of simply using pci_clear_master? > > Might that hang some boxes? > Hmm, why are you thinking? -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
