On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 10:50:50PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2013 at 12:09:51AM +0300, Abdiel Janulgue wrote: > > Ensures that the batch buffer is executed by the resource streamer. > > > > Signed-off-by: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 2 ++ > > include/uapi/drm/i915_drm.h | 5 +++++ > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > > index 0ce0d47..4a56c58 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c > > @@ -962,6 +962,8 @@ i915_gem_do_execbuffer(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, > > case I915_EXEC_DEFAULT: > > case I915_EXEC_RENDER: > > ring = &dev_priv->ring[RCS]; > > + flags |= (args->flags & I915_EXEC_RESOURCE_STREAMER) ? > > + I915_EXEC_RESOURCE_STREAMER : 0; > > Besides this being flags |= args->flags & I915_EXEC_RESOURCE_STREAMER; > flags is a completely different bitfield and you should be translating > into a dispatch value rather than the execbuffer value. > -Chris > To decrypt Chris just a bit, though he was rather more verbose than usual ;-), see the translation of I915_EXEC_SECURE to I915_DISPATCH_SECURE. -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
