Re: [PATCH 0/7] gtt patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> At this point it just seems like you're intentionally making it harder
> for me to ever merge PPGTT.

I have two issues with the merged patches:
1. There's a regression, and QA is meanwhile at the 3rd or so dupe
report. So it's not really an arcane corner case. And I've
specifically written a testcase for secure batch dispatching and
specifically asked you to test to make sure it catches the bugs we've
discussed, so I hope you understand I'm a bit underwhelmed that this
slept through.

2. I have a bit an issue with the currently merged code for rebasing
-internal. I only stumbled over that when I've tried to rebase
-internal and was a bit disappointed to see that despite that I've
raised this the first time your vm->bind/unbind patches showed up
nothing changed.

That's the first&last patch.

The stuff in-between is to make rebasing -internal a bit easier (while
I need to do fixups anyway) since I really botched this 1-2 times
everytime there was a conflict. I've thought that the oustanding stuff
from your series only needs to touch the ->enable callbacks in
i915_gem_gtt.c. A quick look at your ppgtt branches shows that in
addition to that there's only a now outdated cleanup patch and a
rather self-contained debugfs dumper on top. So my thinking was that
right now is an ideal time to polish i915_gem_gtt.c a bit.

But of course I'll drop cleanup patches when they conflict badly with
ongoing stuff, like I've done a few times already. But it didn't look
like this is the case here.

Now you seem to reject my patches, but I don't see any alternate
proposals from you. Furthermore to me it feels a bit the discussion
has derailed into non-constructive form a bit, so I guess this will
take a bit of time to resolve. Since I can't just hold public and
internal trees hostage until that's settled I'll drop your two vma
patches meanwhile.

Cheers, Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux