On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > At this point it just seems like you're intentionally making it harder > for me to ever merge PPGTT. I have two issues with the merged patches: 1. There's a regression, and QA is meanwhile at the 3rd or so dupe report. So it's not really an arcane corner case. And I've specifically written a testcase for secure batch dispatching and specifically asked you to test to make sure it catches the bugs we've discussed, so I hope you understand I'm a bit underwhelmed that this slept through. 2. I have a bit an issue with the currently merged code for rebasing -internal. I only stumbled over that when I've tried to rebase -internal and was a bit disappointed to see that despite that I've raised this the first time your vm->bind/unbind patches showed up nothing changed. That's the first&last patch. The stuff in-between is to make rebasing -internal a bit easier (while I need to do fixups anyway) since I really botched this 1-2 times everytime there was a conflict. I've thought that the oustanding stuff from your series only needs to touch the ->enable callbacks in i915_gem_gtt.c. A quick look at your ppgtt branches shows that in addition to that there's only a now outdated cleanup patch and a rather self-contained debugfs dumper on top. So my thinking was that right now is an ideal time to polish i915_gem_gtt.c a bit. But of course I'll drop cleanup patches when they conflict badly with ongoing stuff, like I've done a few times already. But it didn't look like this is the case here. Now you seem to reject my patches, but I don't see any alternate proposals from you. Furthermore to me it feels a bit the discussion has derailed into non-constructive form a bit, so I guess this will take a bit of time to resolve. Since I can't just hold public and internal trees hostage until that's settled I'll drop your two vma patches meanwhile. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx