[PATCH 0/5] Organize intel_drv.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>

Hi

Daniel reccently complained that we keep adding stuff at the bottom of the file
and keep conflicting with each other. So on the first patch I completely
reorganize the file so that it lists functions per-file. With this, different
patches will mostly only conflict when adding new functions to the same file.

Besides this, patches 2-5 try to remove a few lines from intel_drv.h. All the
other functions seem to be either necessary or not trivial to remove.

These patches were written against Friday's tree, and got a simple conflict
today. They get bit-rot very quickly and will conflict with everybody else's
patches touching the same file. If we don't really want this, please speak :)

Also, feel free to suggest more changes on top of these, and flamewar about the
"extern" keywords.

Cheers,
Paulo

Paulo Zanoni (5):
  drm/i915: reorganize intel_drv.h
  drm/i915: make intel_pipe_has_type static
  drm/i915: make intel_crtc_load_lut static
  drm/i915: make intel_crtc_fb_gamma_{set,get} static
  drm/i915: make hsw_{disable,restore}_lcpll static

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 214 ++++++++----------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h     | 409 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fb.c      |  21 ++
 3 files changed, 326 insertions(+), 318 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.3.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux