On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 03:31:42PM -0700, Todd Previte wrote: > On 09/20/2013 01:57 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > >2013/9/20 Todd Previte <tprevite@xxxxxxxxx>: > >>On 09/20/2013 06:42 AM, Jani Nikula wrote: > >>>Reduce AUX transactions for non-eDP. > >>> > >>>Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxx> > >>>--- > >>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 13 ++++++++----- > >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >>> > >>>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > >>>b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > >>>index dd780bf..f2e16a1 100644 > >>>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > >>>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c > >>>@@ -2691,11 +2691,14 @@ intel_dp_get_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) > >>> /* Check if the panel supports PSR */ > >>> memset(intel_dp->psr_dpcd, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->psr_dpcd)); > >>>- intel_dp_aux_native_read_retry(intel_dp, DP_PSR_SUPPORT, > >>>- intel_dp->psr_dpcd, > >>>- sizeof(intel_dp->psr_dpcd)); > >>>- if (is_edp_psr(intel_dp)) > >>>- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Detected EDP PSR Panel.\n"); > >>>+ if (is_edp(intel_dp)) { > >>>+ intel_dp_aux_native_read_retry(intel_dp, DP_PSR_SUPPORT, > >>>+ intel_dp->psr_dpcd, > >>>+ > >>>sizeof(intel_dp->psr_dpcd)); > >>>+ if (is_edp_psr(intel_dp)) > >>>+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Detected EDP PSR Panel.\n"); > >>>+ } > >>>+ > >>> if (!(intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] & > >>> DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT)) > >>> return true; /* native DP sink */ > >> > >>Couldn't you just use is_edp_psr() at the top and not need the second > >>is_edp() inside the if() statement? As in: > >No, because is_edp_psr() only makes sense after we do the DPCD read > >that checks the PSR bit. > > Yep, I see that now. And thus... > > [Reviewed-by]: Todd Previte <tprevite@xxxxxxxxx> Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx