Re: [PATCH 8/8] drm/i915: Do remaps for all contexts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:17:17PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:28:34PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > On both Ivybridge and Haswell, row remapping information is saved and
> > restored with context. This means, we never actually properly supported
> > the l3 remapping because our sysfs interface is asynchronous (and not
> > tied to any context), and the known faulty HW would be reused by the
> > next context to run.
> > 
> > Not that due to the asynchronous nature of the sysfs entry, there is no
> > point modifying the registers for the existing context. Instead we set a
> > flag for all contexts to load the correct remapping information on the
> > next run. Interested clients can use debugfs to determine whether or not
> > the row has been remapped.
> > 
> > One could propose at this point that we just do the remapping in the
> > kernel. I guess since we have to maintain the sysfs interface anyway,
> > I'm not sure how useful it is, and I do like keeping the policy in
> > userspace; (it wasn't my original decision to make the
> > interface the way it is, so I'm not attached).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c     |  8 +++++++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h         |  1 +
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 17 +++++++++++++--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c       | 38 +++++++++++----------------------
> >  4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > index ada0950..80bed69 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > @@ -145,6 +145,13 @@ describe_obj(struct seq_file *m, struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> >  		seq_printf(m, " (%s)", obj->ring->name);
> >  }
> >  
> > +static void describe_ctx(struct seq_file *m, struct i915_hw_context *ctx)
> > +{
> > +	seq_putc(m, ctx->is_initialized ? 'I' : 'i');
> > +	seq_putc(m, ctx->remap_slice ? 'R' : 'r');
> > +	seq_putc(m, ' ');
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int i915_gem_object_list_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_info_node *node = (struct drm_info_node *) m->private;
> > @@ -1463,6 +1470,7 @@ static int i915_context_status(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> >  
> >  	list_for_each_entry(ctx, &dev_priv->context_list, link) {
> >  		seq_puts(m, "HW context ");
> > +		describe_ctx(m, ctx);
> >  		for_each_ring(ring, dev_priv, i)
> >  			if (ring->default_context == ctx)
> >  				seq_printf(m, "(default context %s) ", ring->name);
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > index 68f992b..6ba78cd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> > @@ -602,6 +602,7 @@ struct i915_hw_context {
> >  	struct kref ref;
> >  	int id;
> >  	bool is_initialized;
> > +	uint8_t remap_slice;
> >  	struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv;
> >  	struct intel_ring_buffer *ring;
> >  	struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj;
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> > index 2bbdce8..72b7202 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
> > @@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ create_hw_context(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  {
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> >  	struct i915_hw_context *ctx;
> > -	int ret;
> > +	int ret, i;
> >  
> >  	ctx = kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> >  	if (ctx == NULL)
> > @@ -181,6 +181,8 @@ create_hw_context(struct drm_device *dev,
> >  
> >  	ctx->file_priv = file_priv;
> >  	ctx->id = ret;
> > +	for (i = 0; i < NUM_L3_SLICES(dev); i++)
> > +		ctx->remap_slice |= 1 << 1;
>                                          ^
> i
> 
> >  
> >  	return ctx;
> >  
> > @@ -396,7 +398,7 @@ static int do_switch(struct i915_hw_context *to)
> >  	struct intel_ring_buffer *ring = to->ring;
> >  	struct i915_hw_context *from = ring->last_context;
> >  	u32 hw_flags = 0;
> > -	int ret;
> > +	int ret, i;
> >  
> >  	BUG_ON(from != NULL && from->obj != NULL && from->obj->pin_count == 0);
> >  
> > @@ -432,6 +434,17 @@ static int do_switch(struct i915_hw_context *to)
> >  		return ret;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	for (i = 0; i < MAX_L3_SLICES; i++) {
> > +		if (!(to->remap_slice & (1<<i)))
> > +			continue;
> > +
> > +		ret = i915_gem_l3_remap(ring, i);
> > +		if (!ret) {
> > +			to->remap_slice &= ~(1<<i);
> > +		}
> > +		/* If it failed, try again next round */
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	/* The backing object for the context is done after switching to the
> >  	 * *next* context. Therefore we cannot retire the previous context until
> >  	 * the next context has already started running. In fact, the below code
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
> > index 65a7274..f0d7e1c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_sysfs.c
> > @@ -118,9 +118,8 @@ i915_l3_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> >  	struct drm_minor *dminor = container_of(dev, struct drm_minor, kdev);
> >  	struct drm_device *drm_dev = dminor->dev;
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = drm_dev->dev_private;
> > -	uint32_t misccpctl;
> >  	int slice = (int)(uintptr_t)attr->private;
> > -	int i, ret;
> > +	int ret;
> >  
> >  	count = round_down(count, 4);
> >  
> > @@ -134,31 +133,16 @@ i915_l3_read(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> >  	if (ret)
> >  		return ret;
> >  
> > -	if (IS_HASWELL(drm_dev)) {
> > -		int last = min_t(int, GEN7_L3LOG_SIZE, count + offset);
> > -		if ((!dev_priv->l3_parity.remap_info[slice]))
> > -			memset(buf + offset, 0, last - offset);
> > -		else
> > -			memcpy(buf + offset,
> > -			       dev_priv->l3_parity.remap_info[slice] + (offset/4),
> > -			       last - offset);
> > -
> > -		i = last;
> > -		goto out;
> > -	}
> > -
> > -	misccpctl = I915_READ(GEN7_MISCCPCTL);
> > -	I915_WRITE(GEN7_MISCCPCTL, misccpctl & ~GEN7_DOP_CLOCK_GATE_ENABLE);
> > -
> > -	for (i = 0; i < count; i += 4)
> > -		*((uint32_t *)(&buf[i])) = I915_READ(GEN7_L3LOG_BASE + offset + i);
> > -
> > -	I915_WRITE(GEN7_MISCCPCTL, misccpctl);
> > +	if ((!dev_priv->l3_parity.remap_info[slice]))
> > +		memset(buf + offset, 0, count);
> > +	else
> > +		memcpy(buf + offset,
> > +		       dev_priv->l3_parity.remap_info[slice] + (offset/4),
> > +		       count);
> 
> Needs fixing after patch 4 is fixed.
> 
> >  
> > -out:
> >  	mutex_unlock(&drm_dev->struct_mutex);
> >  
> > -	return i;
> > +	return count;
> >  }
> >  
> >  static ssize_t
> > @@ -170,6 +154,7 @@ i915_l3_write(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> >  	struct drm_minor *dminor = container_of(dev, struct drm_minor, kdev);
> >  	struct drm_device *drm_dev = dminor->dev;
> >  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = drm_dev->dev_private;
> > +	struct i915_hw_context *ctx;
> >  	u32 *temp = NULL; /* Just here to make handling failures easy */
> >  	int slice = (int)(uintptr_t)attr->private;
> >  	int ret;
> > @@ -206,8 +191,9 @@ i915_l3_write(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
> >  
> >  	memcpy(dev_priv->l3_parity.remap_info[slice] + (offset/4), buf, count);
> >  
> > -	if (i915_gem_l3_remap(&dev_priv->ring[RCS], slice))
> > -		count = 0;
> > +	/* NB: We defer the remapping until we switch to the context */
> > +	list_for_each_entry(ctx, &dev_priv->context_list, link)
> > +		ctx->remap_slice |= (1<<slice);
> 
> Should we force a context switch on the next batch if the current
> context has remap_slice != 0?
> 

I think that's a good idea as long as you're willing to review the added
complexity.

> Also what happens if hw_contexts_disabled==false?
> 

Well if I had gotten my way and we'd merged full PPGTT already,
hw_contexts couldn't be disabled; but alas it is a valid concern.

I think punting is the right thing to do here. Mesa won't run if
contexts are disabled. However an error message, and return value would
be appropriate. What do you think?

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx





[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux