From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
So far we control everything and nothing exceeds the current limits,
but (i) we never think about these limits when reviewing patches, (ii)
not all the callers check the return values and (iii) if we ever hit
any of these messages, we'll have to fix the code that added the bad
message.
The current limit for these messages is 20 since we only have 5 data
registers on all the current gens.
The checks inside intel_dp_aux_native_{write,read} are to prevent
buffer overflows. The check inside intel_dp_aux_ch is to prevent
writing past our 5 data registers.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
index 8c70a83..c324a59 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
@@ -436,6 +436,12 @@ intel_dp_aux_ch(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
goto out;
}
+ /* Only 5 data registers! */
+ if (WARN_ON(send_bytes > 20 || recv_size > 20)) {
+ ret = -E2BIG;
+ goto out;
+ }
+
while ((aux_clock_divider = get_aux_clock_divider(intel_dp, clock++))) {
/* Must try at least 3 times according to DP spec */
for (try = 0; try < 5; try++) {
@@ -526,9 +532,10 @@ intel_dp_aux_native_write(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
int msg_bytes;
uint8_t ack;
+ if (WARN_ON(send_bytes > 16))
+ return -E2BIG;
+
intel_dp_check_edp(intel_dp);
- if (send_bytes > 16)
- return -1;
msg[0] = AUX_NATIVE_WRITE << 4;
msg[1] = address >> 8;
msg[2] = address & 0xff;
@@ -569,6 +576,9 @@ intel_dp_aux_native_read(struct intel_dp *intel_dp,
uint8_t ack;
int ret;
+ if (WARN_ON(recv_bytes > 19))
+ return -E2BIG;
+
intel_dp_check_edp(intel_dp);
msg[0] = AUX_NATIVE_READ << 4;
msg[1] = address >> 8;
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
