On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:21:21PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013, Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > So far we control all the reads an none of them exceeds the current > > limit of 20 bytes, but we never think about this when reviewing > > patches, so we may at some point in the future overflow the buffer. > > > > My initial patch just added a WARN in case we were about to overflow > > the buffer, but Chris suggested to make the size of the array dynamic. > > VLA on stack in kernel gives me an uneasy feeling, but I'll survive. IIRC sparse will complain about this. Might worth double checking. -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
