On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 22:38:41 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 01:43:20PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > Unsupported; we just do RC6. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > You only change the sysfs stuff here, so I wondered where the hunk for > intel_pm.c is. And noticed that we don't actually obey the enable_rc6 > parameter! Aside: We don't do any such force-to-0 stuff on other > platforms, so why do we need this? Gosh all these questions for such a simple patch. I was just annoyed that the sysfs rc6 residency test was getting bogus values from registers that happened to be there but don't correlate with rc6. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
