On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 01:40:25PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > Paulo reported that if he set the amount of reserved memory to 0, then > we emitted a warning about a conflict before disabling our use of stolen > memory. This was introduced with > > commit eaba1b8f3379b5d100bd146b9a41d28348bdfd09 > Author: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu Jul 4 12:28:35 2013 +0100 > > drm/i915: Verify that our stolen memory doesn't conflict > > and is simply fixed by checking for a no reservation first. > > Reported-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
