[PATCH 0/2] drm/i915: adjusted_mode.clock vs. port_clock vs. pixel_multiplier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



As I mentioned before, I'd like adjusted_mode.clock to be the pipe pixel clock.
So to me it looks like all we need to do  to store the pixel multiplied 
clock into port_clock, and then adjusted_mode.clock can stay as the
non-multiplied pixel clock.

Seems simple enough. But a big warning here, I didn't test this at all yet.
Also I don't have any SDVO hardware to make sure I didn't fumble something
on that side.
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux