On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 09:35:14AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 04:33:58PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:00:07 -0700 > > Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > We still maintain code internally that cares about preliminary support. > > > Leaving the check here doesn't hurt anyone, and should keep things more > > > in line. > > > > > > This time around, stick the info in the intel_info structure, and also > > > change the error from DRM_ERROR->DRM_INFO. > > > > I hate this param. > > > > But this looks like a better way to do it than the ID list we had in > > pci_probe before. We've never had a table of pci ids, but a simple check for IS_HASWELL ... > > > > Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Daniel, ping. One of my goals is to allow people to easily look at > source and determine which HW is preliminary, and which isn't. Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
