On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 04:20:06PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 01:46:21PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > So that we can find the callers who introduce a ring stall. A single > > ring stall is not too unwelcome, the right issue becomes when they start > > to interlock and prevent any concurrent work. That, however, is a little > > tricker to detect with a mere tracepoint! > > I was staring at the semaphore code a bit recently, and I was wondering > if it would make sense to do a manual seqno check (against the ring's > current seqno, not just the last sync_seqno) before we decide to > add the semaphore into the ring? If we use the cheap check, yeah. We can also store the cross-sync seqno as well. Both are going to be unlikely paths though. Anyway, I'm moving the tracepoint over to the ring rather than the object for consistency. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
