On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 16 Aug 2013, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 05:30:25PM -0700, james.ausmus@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> Hello All-
> >>
> >> I'm trying to determine if the ChromeOS-only patches being carried by
> >> Google still make sense and are the right way to do things in the 3.11+
> >> world, and Jesse asked me to forward the patches to the list for evaluation
> >> and potential upstreaming.
> >
> > I've quickly read through the pile here and there's a few things we
> > need to look at.
>
> Ditto, and agreed.
>
> > But one thing which makes assessing the patches here a bit a pain is
> > that often there's a fixup later on again.
>
> Another pain is that sometimes the fixup is first, i.e. the series does
> not seem to be in the right order.
One of the issues is that it's not truly a series, but rather individual patches
dating back through 2011 - I thought I had gotten git-send-email to push them
out in chronological order, but maybe I was less successful than I thought. :)
I'll see what I can do in regards to squishing some of these down - I have fairly
limited knowledge when it comes to the i915 driver, so it may not end up
perfect, but I'll give it a go. :)
Thanks!
-James
>
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> --
> Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
