On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 06:19:09PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > Just like: > > Author: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Mon Aug 12 11:53:24 2013 +0100 > > video/hdmi: Don't let the user of this API create invalid infoframes > > But this time for the horizontal/vertical bar data present bits. > > Signed-off-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/video/hdmi.c | 5 +++-- > include/linux/hdmi.h | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) Same comments as for patch 5. Although I begin to see some sense in this. Perhaps not exposing these boolean fields is a good idea after all. I wonder if we're excluding some particular use-case by not exposing these fields. Thierry
Attachment:
pgpNtnz4UvbHz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
