On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:12 AM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 08:45:47AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: >> [ Sending to intel-gfx only for 1st feedback ] >> >> Hi, >> >> while still digging into my next-20130813 issue, I have searched for >> some defines: > > [snip] > >> I also checked intel-gpu-tools which has also cach***e*** pattern in >> some defines. >> >> What's the impact of this misspelling? > > Absolutely zero. The only users do not care what the kernel or even > libdrm call it, only that the value works. How can the values work if you have different defined macros (defines)? - Sedat - _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
