On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 06:23:29PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I have bisected the issue on Linux v3.11-rc5 + drm-intel-nightly: > > > > 5456fe3882812aba251886e36fe55bfefb8e8829 is the first bad commit > > commit 5456fe3882812aba251886e36fe55bfefb8e8829 > > Author: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Thu Aug 8 14:41:07 2013 +0100 > > > > drm/i915: Allocate LLC ringbuffers from stolen > > > > As stolen objects now behave identically (wrt to default LLC cacheing) > > as their normal system counterparts, we no longer have to differentiate > > our usage for ringbuffers. So allocate them from stolen on SNB+ as well. > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> > > > > :040000 040000 de063a052f39095f4d2f51b49caef9f827df41e8 > > 1c819aa5501a9fcc9912a5c7c037c71b9b9e9a6b M drivers > > > > See also attached files! > > > > With the attached revert-patch my system is OK (with my customized X stack). No indication of a GPU hang? I'm puzzled as to how this ends up with the scanout being misread. cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_gem_stolen cat /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_gem_framebuffer would be interesting. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
