2013/8/6 Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 06:57:14PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: >> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> >> >> I did some brief tests and the "new_val = pmimr" condition usually >> happens a few times after exiting games. >> >> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@xxxxxxxxx> > > I'm not sure of the value of this patch by itself. It did make me wonder > what you were micro-optimising, and then I saw patch 5 and it made more > sense. Patches 4 and 5 are just micro optimizations and shouldn't be needed for the PC8+, but I thought they would be useful. If you think they're not worth it, we can discard them. I was trying to make the code similar to the other IMR-changing functions. If we massage the code a little bit more we could make all the IMR-changing functions share the same code > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre -- Paulo Zanoni _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
