Re: intel-ddx: v2.21.14 breaks with llvm/clang v3.3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am here on Ubuntu/precise AMD64 and using the llvm/clang prebuilt
>> toolchain from <llvm.org>.
>>
>> From my build.log:
>> ...
>> make[3]: Entering directory
>> `/home/wearefam/src/xserver-xorg-video-intel/xf86-video-intel-git/src/sna'
>>   CC     blt.lo
>> warning: unknown warning option '-Wno-maybe-uninitialized'; did you
>> mean '-Wno-uninitialized'? [-Wunknown-warning-option]
>> blt.c:141:1: error: unknown type name 'fast'
>> fast void
>> ^
>> blt.c:141:6: error: expected identifier or '('
>> fast void
>>      ^
>> 1 warning and 2 errors generated.
>> make[3]: *** [blt.lo] Error 1
>>
>> If you need further informations, please let me know.
>>
>
> I did the following reverts:
>
> $ git revert --no-edit 246911d742569eed6675698c1e51032ba50917d3
> [XF86-Video-Intel-v2.21.14 71429c4] Revert "sna: Don't force inline
> string-ops for the general memcpy_blt routine"
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> $ git revert --no-edit a3eea6e61e15a147165400c81eab82a14a9ce2fe
> [XF86-Video-Intel-v2.21.14 bf797f2] Revert "Suppress misleading
> warnings for -Wmaybe-uninitialized"
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>

"Better Uninitialized Warnings" [1] might be worth reading (even this
is for gcc).

- Sedat -

[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Better_Uninitialized_Warnings
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux