Re: [PATCH 02/29] drm/i915: Rework drop caches for checkpatch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 03, 2013 at 12:32:35PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 04:59:55PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > With an upcoming change to bind, to make checkpatch happy and keep the
> > code clean, we need to rework this code a bit.
> > 
> > This should have no functional impact.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 13 +++++++------
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > index be69807..61ffa71 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> > @@ -1781,12 +1781,13 @@ i915_drop_caches_set(void *data, u64 val)
> >  
> >  	if (val & DROP_BOUND) {
> >  		list_for_each_entry_safe(obj, next, &vm->inactive_list,
> > -					 mm_list)
> > -			if (obj->pin_count == 0) {
> > -				ret = i915_gem_object_unbind(obj);
> > -				if (ret)
> > -					goto unlock;
> > -			}
> > +					 mm_list) {
> > +			if (obj->pin_count)
> > +				continue;
> 
> Give me a newline here, and I'm sold.
> 

Got it. As you may have noticed, this was already fixed in patch 20 of
the series.

> > +			ret = i915_gem_object_unbind(obj);
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				goto unlock;
> > +		}
> >  	}
> 
> -- 
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux