Re: Ugly patches for stolen reservation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/26/2013 01:24 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> Am I being too pedantic in expecting that we still mark it 
> e820-reserved?
> 
> This area really isnt an ordinary PCI resource such as a 
> BAR or an MMIO region. It's truly system RAM (which cannot 
> be moved/reallocated), used by graphics hardware, and the 
> firmware should have marked it reserved.
> 
> (The end result should be the same in any case, so this is 
> a detail.)
> 

I, too, would prefer to see it marked as reserved.

	-hpa


_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux