Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86: add early quirk for reserving Intel graphics stolen memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:22:49AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> Systems with Intel graphics controllers set aside memory exclusively for
> gfx driver use.  This memory is not marked in the E820 as reserved or as
> RAM, and so is subject to overlap from E820 manipulation later in the
> boot process.  On some systems, MMIO space is allocated on top, despite
> the efforts of the "RAM buffer" approach, which simply rounds memory
> boundaries up to 64M to try to catch space that may decode as RAM and so
> is not suitable for MMIO.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/pci-direct.h |    1 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c    |  150 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/pci/early.c              |    8 ++
>  include/drm/i915_drm.h            |   18 +++++
>  4 files changed, 177 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci-direct.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci-direct.h
> index b1e7a45..a1dc283 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pci-direct.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pci-direct.h
> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>  extern u32 read_pci_config(u8 bus, u8 slot, u8 func, u8 offset);
>  extern u8 read_pci_config_byte(u8 bus, u8 slot, u8 func, u8 offset);
>  extern u16 read_pci_config_16(u8 bus, u8 slot, u8 func, u8 offset);
> +extern u32 read_pci_config_32(u8 bus, u8 slot, u8 func, u8 offset);
>  extern void write_pci_config(u8 bus, u8 slot, u8 func, u8 offset, u32 val);
>  extern void write_pci_config_byte(u8 bus, u8 slot, u8 func, u8 offset, u8 val);
>  extern void write_pci_config_16(u8 bus, u8 slot, u8 func, u8 offset, u16 val);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> index 94ab6b9..208ed8d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>  #include <linux/pci.h>
>  #include <linux/acpi.h>
>  #include <linux/pci_ids.h>
> +#include <drm/i915_drm.h>
>  #include <asm/pci-direct.h>
>  #include <asm/dma.h>
>  #include <asm/io_apic.h>
> @@ -208,6 +209,153 @@ static void __init intel_remapping_check(int num, int slot, int func)
>  
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Systems with Intel graphics controllers set aside memory exclusively
> + * for gfx driver use.  This memory is not marked in the E820 as reserved
> + * or as RAM, and so is subject to overlap from E820 manipulation later
> + * in the boot process.  On some systems, MMIO space is allocated on top,
> + * despite the efforts of the "RAM buffer" approach, which simply rounds
> + * memory boundaries up to 64M to try to catch space that may decode
> + * as RAM and so is not suitable for MMIO.
> + *
> + * And yes, so far on current devices the base addr is always under 4G.
> + */

And for the indefinite future.

> +static u32 __init intel_stolen_base(int num, int slot, int func)
> +{
> +	u32 base;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Almost universally we can find the Graphics Base of Stolen Memory
> +	 * at offset 0x5c in the igfx configuration space. On a few (desktop)
> +	 * machines this is also mirrored in the bridge device at different
> +	 * locations, or in the MCHBAR.
> +	 */
> +	base = read_pci_config_32(num, slot, func, 0x5c);
> +	base &= ~((1<<20) - 1);

I wish there was some synatic sugar we can apply for base &= -MB(1);
> +
> +	return base;
> +}
> +
> +#define KB(x)	((x) * 1024)
> +#define MB(x)	(KB (KB (x)))
> +#define GB(x)	(MB (KB (x)))
> +
> +static size_t __init intel_stolen_size(int num, int slot, int func)

SNB+ has a different defintion. (And IVB has multiple definitions in the
bspec, but we've found the SNB one works best...)

> +static struct pci_device_id intel_stolen_ids[] __initdata = {

const? Or is initdata already applying that fixup?

> +static void __init intel_graphics_stolen(int num, int slot, int func)
> +{
> +	size_t size;
> +	int i;
> +	u32 start;
> +	u16 device, subvendor, subdevice;
> +
> +	device = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, PCI_DEVICE_ID);
> +	subvendor = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func,
> +				       PCI_SUBSYSTEM_VENDOR_ID);
> +	subdevice = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, PCI_SUBSYSTEM_ID);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(intel_stolen_ids); i++) {
> +		if (intel_stolen_ids[i].device == device &&
> +		    (intel_stolen_ids[i].subvendor == PCI_ANY_ID ||
> +		     intel_stolen_ids[i].subvendor == subvendor) &&
> +		    (intel_stolen_ids[i].subdevice == PCI_ANY_ID ||
> +		     intel_stolen_ids[i].subdevice == subdevice)) {
> +			size = intel_stolen_size(num, slot, func);

See above comments for needing to split this on before/after SNB. And
wouldn't it be cool to unifying the SNB quirk dispatch with this table?
Is that even possible?

> +			start = intel_stolen_base(num, slot, func);
> +			if (size && start)
> +				goto found;
> +			else
> +				break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	/* No match or invalid data, don't bother reserving */
> +	return;
> +found:
> +	/* Mark this space as reserved */
> +	e820_add_region(start, size, E820_RESERVED);
> +	return;
> +}
> +
>  #define QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE 	0x1
>  #define QFLAG_APPLIED		0x2
>  #define QFLAG_DONE		(QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE|QFLAG_APPLIED)
> @@ -241,6 +389,8 @@ static struct chipset early_qrk[] __initdata = {
>  	  PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE, 0, intel_remapping_check },
>  	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x3406, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST,
>  	  PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE, 0, intel_remapping_check },
> +	{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_CLASS_DISPLAY_VGA, PCI_ANY_ID,
> +	  QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE, intel_graphics_stolen },
>  	{}
>  };
>  
> diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/early.c b/arch/x86/pci/early.c
> index d1067d5..a3fc44c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/pci/early.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/early.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,14 @@ u16 read_pci_config_16(u8 bus, u8 slot, u8 func, u8 offset)
>  	return v;
>  }
>  
> +u32 read_pci_config_32(u8 bus, u8 slot, u8 func, u8 offset)
> +{
> +	u32 v;
> +	outl(0x80000000 | (bus<<16) | (slot<<11) | (func<<8) | offset, 0xcf8);
> +	v = inl(0xcfc);
> +	return v;
> +}

This is just read_pci_config().
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux