On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:24:05AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > I'd like to have a fully reliable object count though since that should be > useful for writing leak testcases. kmemleak isn't that reliable > unfortunately. Looking at the debugfs stuff we already report > bound+unbound (just separate) so I don't think this patch adds useful > information. It's not about adding useful information, it's about removing garbage (negative object counts and sizes -> overflow) which concerns me more. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
