On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:42:40AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 07:08:07PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > Map, and unmap are logical functionalities to add for an address space. > > They do more or less what you'd think: take an object and create a > > mapping via the GPU's page tables to that object. Of course, without the > > rest of the patches from [3], there will only ever be 1 address space, > > with the weird aliasing ppgtt behind it. One thing which I toyed with, > > but opted not to include was to directly pass obj,vm to map/unmap > > instead of doing the slightly less pretty way as I've done in execbuf > > and bind. In the future I think I may just do this, but for now it's not > > a big win as the end result wasn't much better (and I didn't get it to > > immediately work). > > That's annoying. Currently we use map to refer to the process of making > a CPU mapping to the objects and bind for doing it from the GPU's > perspective. And since the CPU map may well require a GPU map, keeping > the nomenclature distinct helps easily confused me. > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre I can rename it, I expect you will review it. -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
