The TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION is supposed to generate more efficient code
than if (cond) trace(), which is what we are currently using inside the
register access functions.
v2: Rebase onto uncore
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h | 8 +++++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index 0513743..cc3e74a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ static int gen6_drpc_info(struct seq_file *m)
}
gt_core_status = readl(dev_priv->regs + GEN6_GT_CORE_STATUS);
- trace_i915_reg_rw(false, GEN6_GT_CORE_STATUS, gt_core_status, 4);
+ trace_i915_reg_rw(false, GEN6_GT_CORE_STATUS, gt_core_status, 4, true);
rpmodectl1 = I915_READ(GEN6_RP_CONTROL);
rcctl1 = I915_READ(GEN6_RC_CONTROL);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
index 7d283b5..2933e2f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_trace.h
@@ -406,10 +406,12 @@ TRACE_EVENT(i915_flip_complete,
TP_printk("plane=%d, obj=%p", __entry->plane, __entry->obj)
);
-TRACE_EVENT(i915_reg_rw,
- TP_PROTO(bool write, u32 reg, u64 val, int len),
+TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION(i915_reg_rw,
+ TP_PROTO(bool write, u32 reg, u64 val, int len, bool trace),
- TP_ARGS(write, reg, val, len),
+ TP_ARGS(write, reg, val, len, trace),
+
+ TP_CONDITION(trace),
TP_STRUCT__entry(
__field(u64, val)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
index 2c39467..b2703db 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_uncore.c
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ u##x i915_read##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, bool trace) { \
val = __raw_i915_read##x(dev_priv, reg); \
} \
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags); \
- if (trace) trace_i915_reg_rw(false, reg, val, sizeof(val)); \
+ trace_i915_reg_rw(false, reg, val, sizeof(val), trace); \
return val; \
}
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@ __i915_read(64)
void i915_write##x(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, u32 reg, u##x val, bool trace) { \
unsigned long irqflags; \
u32 __fifo_ret = 0; \
- if (trace) trace_i915_reg_rw(true, reg, val, sizeof(val)); \
+ trace_i915_reg_rw(true, reg, val, sizeof(val), trace); \
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev_priv->uncore.lock, irqflags); \
if (NEEDS_FORCE_WAKE((dev_priv), (reg))) { \
__fifo_ret = __gen6_gt_wait_for_fifo(dev_priv); \
--
1.8.3.2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
