On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:50:55PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 04:19:05PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > It was high time to follow up on: > > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2013-April/027361.html > > > > Changes from v2: > > • Take into account Daniel's comments and add the tests he listed > > • Actually runs on simulation now > > lgtm overall, please push. One thing we might want to do is add a generic > drmtest_dummy_blt_load function which auto-tunes for simulation runs. Ever > time I need to reliably hit a seqno wait in a test somewhere I just > copy-paste that little bit of lore so we'll have a constant game of > whack-a-mole for those. With a helper it would Just Work. Right, so pushed this to progress forward a bit, generally agreed to be torwards the right direction. i-g-t needs more work, but that'll probably be always the case. -- Damien _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
