Re: [PATCH 09/11] drm/i915: Adding global I915_PARAM for PSR ENABLED.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 5:24 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 10:08:34PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 06:01:03PM -0300, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 02:46:52PM -0300, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
>> > >> Hi Chris,
>> > >>
>> > >> could you please review this specific one or give you ack here?
>> > >
>> > > Didn't see anything wrong with it. The only caveat I have is that the
>> > > GETPARAM must be accurate immediately following a setcrtc.
>> >
>> > To be truly honest I have no idea, mainly when we alternate with fbcon
>> > updating psr state at set_base.
>> > Could you please also review subsequent patches in this series... 10 and 11.
>> > I think 11 answer this question...
>>
>> If it is not clear by this point, and the changelog doesn't make it
>> clear, then something is missing from this patch. Hint ;-)
>
> I'll punt on userspace interface changes, at least until we've figured out
> a clear picture how to do this.

agreed

> -Daniel
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch



--
Rodrigo Vivi
Blog: http://blog.vivi.eng.br
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx




[Index of Archives]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]
  Powered by Linux