On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 13:38 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 17, 2013 09:16:38 AM Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 00:01 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, July 16, 2013 05:08:16 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 17:32 +0400, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> > > > > Hmm. I found regression in user-space. In GNOME (maybe and other DEs) we no longer see switch status of backlight.
> > > >
> > > > Yeah, I can duplicate that. Rafael, we have to call
> > > > acpi_video_init_brightness() even if we're not going to initialise the
> > > > backlight - Thinkpads seem to use this as the trigger for enabling ACPI
> > > > notifications rather than handling it in firmware. This seems to do the
> > > > job:
> > >
> > > Igor, does this additional patch from Matthew help?
> > Yes. With this patch I have backlight switch indicator on my ThinkPad X230.
>
> OK, thanks for the confirmation.
>
> Can you please also check if applying the appended patch on top of the Matthew's
> one changes anything (ie. things still work)?
Yes. I've tested and not found regressions in indicator or in switcher. Good work.
>
> Rafael
>
>
> ---
Tested-by: Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@xxxxxxxxx>
> drivers/acpi/video.c | 5 +++++
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/video.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/video.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/video.c
> @@ -957,6 +957,11 @@ static void acpi_video_device_find_cap(s
> if (result)
> printk(KERN_ERR PREFIX "Create sysfs link\n");
>
> + } else {
> + /* Remove the brightness object. */
> + kfree(device->brightness->levels);
> + kfree(device->brightness);
> + device->brightness = NULL;
> }
> }
>
>
>
--
Igor Gnatenko
Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)
Linux 3.11.0-0.rc0.git7.1.fc20.x86_64
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
