On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 03:01:38AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 11:29 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > FYI, there are new warnings show up in > > > tree: git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel.git drm-intel-fixes > > > head: 71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5 > > > commit: 71e4092e52499ec74bc1dec0f883b15f2c424ec5 [52/52] drm/i915: fix long-standing SNB regression in power consumption after resume v2 > > > > > > scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-drm-i915-fix-long-standing-SNB-regression-in-power-c.patch > > > > > > ERROR: Unrecognized email address: 'stable.]' > > > #41: > > > cc: stable.] > > > > Well, I've added that while applying the patch - I tend to smash > > maintainer notes into the sob section and word-wraping caused the cc: > > stable remark to be parsed. Is there an officially sanctioned way for > > such notes that appeases checkpatch? Adding lkml and checkpatch > > maintainer. > > -Daniel > > (It would have been nice to get the content that failes > instead of having to pull the tree) Oops, sorry. > Don't wrap text to start a line with cc: > > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > [danvet: Add note about v1 vs. v2 of this patch and use standard > layout for the commit citation. Also add the tested-bys from v1 and a > cc: stable.] > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Note: tiny conflict due to the addition of > > You could have added something like: > > [danvet: Add note about v1 vs. v2 of this patch and use standard > layout for the commit citation. > Also add the tested-bys from v1 and a cc: stable.] Ok, I'll try to rewrap if the cc: hits the first row next time around - just didn't occur to me that checkpatch would notice and I tend to not re-run checkpatch before pushing when editing a patch a bit. Thanks, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx