On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 11:39:44AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:42:46AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > > We need it before we set the pte_encode function pointers, which happens > > really early, in gtt_init. > > > > The problem with just doing the normal sequence earlier is we don't have > > the ability to use forcewake until after the pte functions have been set > > up. > > > > Since all solutions are somewhat ugly (barring rewriting all the init > > ordering), I've opted to do the detection really early, and the enabling > > later - since the register to detect doesn't require forcewake. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> > > Looking at patch 3.5 here and patch 3 I think those should be squashed > together. Ok if I do that when applying? > -Daniel Of course. [snip] -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
