On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 04:35:13PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com> > > The ironlake_irq_handler and ivybridge_irq_handler functions do > basically the same thing, but they have different implementation > styles. With this patch we reorganize ironlake_irq_handler in a way > that makes it look very similar to ivybridge_irq_handler. > > One of the advantages of this new function style is that we don't > write 0 to the IIR registers anymore. Please tightly scope the variables where applicable. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
