On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:43:58PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 8:40 PM, Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 08:14:41PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 11:02:07AM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > >> > To make users life a little easier figuring out what they have on their > >> > system. > >> > > >> > Ideally, I'd really like to report LLC size, but it turned out to be a > >> > bit of a pain. Maybe I'll revisit it in the future. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben at bwidawsk.net> > >> > >> I think a getparam for eLLC would be neat, so that usespace can use it to > >> tune working set sizes. > >> -Daniel > >> > > And I assume drop debugfs? > > Yeah, I guess the DRM_INFO message in dmesg should be good enough > then. For userspace's convenience we could even look into exposing the > LLC size with a getparam. > -Daniel > I would like to do this since we have easy access to cpuid. I know Chad really wants it. If you'll accept the patch, I'll write it. > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
