2013/6/12 Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com>:
> From: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar at intel.com>
>
> v2: reuse of just created is_edp_psr and put it at right place.
> v3: move is_edp_psr above intel_edp_disable
>
> Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar <shobhit.kumar at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at gmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 13 +++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> index 759a1c5..5332186 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> @@ -1342,6 +1342,12 @@ static void intel_dp_get_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
> pipe_config->adjusted_mode.flags |= flags;
> }
>
> +static bool is_edp_psr(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> +{
> + return (is_edp(intel_dp) &&
> + (intel_dp->psr_dpcd[0] & DP_PSR_IS_SUPPORTED));
> +}
My only concern about this is: what will happen when they define PSR
version 02? Will that DP_PSR_IS_SUPPORTED bit still be 1? Anyway, if
things change in the future we should fix the DP_PSR_IS_SUPPORTED
definition and all its users, so for now I think the code is fine.
The patch looks good and I think that we could try to merge patches 1
and 2 now because they allow us to at least properly detect which
panels support PSR and which panels don't.
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni at intel.com>
> +
> static void intel_disable_dp(struct intel_encoder *encoder)
> {
> struct intel_dp *intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(&encoder->base);
> @@ -2255,6 +2261,13 @@ intel_dp_get_dpcd(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> if (intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DPCD_REV] == 0)
> return false; /* DPCD not present */
>
> + /* Check if the panel supports PSR */
> + memset(intel_dp->psr_dpcd, 0, sizeof(intel_dp->psr_dpcd));
> + intel_dp_aux_native_read_retry(intel_dp, DP_PSR_SUPPORT,
> + intel_dp->psr_dpcd,
> + sizeof(intel_dp->psr_dpcd));
> + if (is_edp_psr(intel_dp))
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Detected EDP PSR Panel.\n");
> if (!(intel_dp->dpcd[DP_DOWNSTREAMPORT_PRESENT] &
> DP_DWN_STRM_PORT_PRESENT))
> return true; /* native DP sink */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index 0445d8c..18d9dea 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -470,6 +470,7 @@ struct intel_dp {
> uint8_t link_bw;
> uint8_t lane_count;
> uint8_t dpcd[DP_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE];
> + uint8_t psr_dpcd[EDP_PSR_RECEIVER_CAP_SIZE];
> uint8_t downstream_ports[DP_MAX_DOWNSTREAM_PORTS];
> struct i2c_adapter adapter;
> struct i2c_algo_dp_aux_data algo;
> --
> 1.7.11.7
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
--
Paulo Zanoni
