On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 01:27:54PM -0800, Navare, Manasi wrote: > On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:38:19PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote: > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Introduce helpers to query whether the crtc is the slave/master > > for bigjoiner. This decouples most places from the exact > > state layout we use to track this relationship, allowing us > > to change and extend it more easily. > > So even with the bitmask approach, we still plan to have bools for bigjoiner_slave? Nope. No longer necessary. > > > > > Performed with cocci: > > @@ > > expression S, E; > > @@ > > ( > > S->bigjoiner_slave = E; > > | > > - S->bigjoiner_slave > > + intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(S) > > ) > > > > @@ > > expression S, E; > > @@ > > ( > > - E && S->bigjoiner && !intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(S) > > + E && intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_master(S) > > | > > - S->bigjoiner && !intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(S) > > + intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_master(S) > > ) > > > > @@ > > expression S; > > @@ > > - (intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_master(S)) > > + intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_master(S) > > > > @@ > > expression S, E1, E2, E3; > > @@ > > - intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(S) ? E1 : S->bigjoiner ? E2 : E3 > > + intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(S) ? E1 : intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_master(S) ? E2 : E3 > > > > @@ > > typedef bool; > > @@ > > + bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > > + { > > + return crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave; > > + } > > + > > intel_master_crtc(...) {...} > > > > @@ > > typedef bool; > > @@ > > + bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_master(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state) > > + { > > + return crtc_state->bigjoiner && !crtc_state->bigjoiner_slave; > > + } > > + > > intel_master_crtc(...) {...} > > > > @@ > > typedef bool; > > identifier S; > > @@ > > - bool is_trans_port_sync_mode(const struct intel_crtc_state *S); > > + bool is_trans_port_sync_mode(const struct intel_crtc_state *state); > > + bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_slave(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); > > + bool intel_crtc_is_bigjoiner_master(const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state); > > Is all of the above part of the commit message? Dont understand why its changing is_trans_port_sync_mode() ? I had to touch that line to get coccinelle to actually do the transformation. For some reason it refused to do anything if I just tried to add the two new lines. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel