On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Paulo Zanoni <przanoni at gmail.com> wrote: >> So all together I vote for the generic interface to be called something >> like >> >> intel_aux_display_runtime_forbid/allow > > I changed to intel_aux_display_shutdown_forbid/allow, because we > forbid the shutdown, not the "runtime". Just one quick comment: The idea was to be 100% consisten with the runtime pm api (I've dropped the pm_ part unfortunately), which is: extern void pm_runtime_allow(struct device *dev); extern void pm_runtime_forbid(struct device *dev); I think being consistent here is important in the light of us needing runtime pm eventually anyway. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
