From: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
The gem_exec_fair test is specifically testing scheduler algorithm
performance. However, GuC does not implement the same algorithm as
execlist mode and this test is not applicable. So, until sw arch
approves a new algorithm and it is implemented in GuC, stop running
the test.
v2: Add exceptions for TGL/RKL/ADL-S - review feedback from Tvrtko.
v3: Use the somewhat suspect submission test helpers instead - review
feedback from Ashutosh.
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@xxxxxxxxx>
---
tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
index ef5a450f6..5cbb48f5a 100644
--- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
+++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_fair.c
@@ -1314,6 +1314,12 @@ igt_main
igt_require(gem_scheduler_enabled(i915));
igt_require(gem_scheduler_has_ctx_priority(i915));
+ /*
+ * These tests are for a specific scheduling model which is
+ * not currently implemented by GuC. So skip on GuC platforms.
+ */
+ igt_require(!gem_has_guc_submission(i915));
+
cfg = intel_ctx_cfg_all_physical(i915);
igt_info("CS timestamp frequency: %d\n",
--
2.25.1
