On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 04:23:06PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > Ok ok I'm sold, at least until we find otherwise or Alan's team reports > back that the GTT space is needed. > > Extending the interface to not reserve GTT space makes sense; I can do > that as a follow up, if you're ok with the existing code. I'm happy with the rest of the patch - just wishing that the size was expressed in pages (6 * GTT_PAGE_SIZE) and similarly the mask ~(GTT_PAGE_SIZE-1). Bring on the change to avoid reserving GTT space and lets hope it sticks! :) -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
