On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 08:40:56PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 13.07.21 um 22:51 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > > intel-gfx-ci realized that something is not quite coherent anymore on > > some platforms for our i915+vgem tests, when I tried to switch vgem > > over to shmem helpers. > > > > After lots of head-scratching I realized that I've removed calls to > > drm_clflush. And we need those. To make this a bit cleaner use the > > same page allocation tooling as ttm, which does internally clflush > > (and more, as neeeded on any platform instead of just the intel x86 > > cpus i915 can be combined with). > > Vgem would therefore not work correctly on non-X86 platforms? Anything using shmem helpers doesn't work correctly on non-x86 platforms. At least if they use wc. vgem with intel-gfx-ci is simply running some very nasty tests that catch the bugs. I'm kinda hoping that someone from the armsoc world would care enough to fix this there. But it's a tricky issue. > > > > Unfortunately this doesn't exist on arm, or as a generic feature. For > > that I think only the dma-api can get at wc memory reliably, so maybe > > we'd need some kind of GFP_WC flag to do this properly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: "Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c > > index 296ab1b7c07f..657d2490aaa5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_shmem_helper.c > > @@ -10,6 +10,10 @@ > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > #include <linux/vmalloc.h> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 > > +#include <asm/set_memory.h> > > +#endif > > + > > #include <drm/drm.h> > > #include <drm/drm_device.h> > > #include <drm/drm_drv.h> > > @@ -162,6 +166,11 @@ static int drm_gem_shmem_get_pages_locked(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem) > > return PTR_ERR(pages); > > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 > > + if (shmem->map_wc) > > + set_pages_array_wc(pages, obj->size >> PAGE_SHIFT); > > +#endif > > I cannot comment much on the technical details of the caching of various > architectures. If this patch goes in, there should be a longer comment that > reflects the discussion in this thread. It's apparently a workaround. > > I think the call itself should be hidden behind a DRM API, which depends on > CONFIG_X86. Something simple like > > ifdef CONFIG_X86 > drm_set_pages_array_wc() > { > set_pages_array_wc(); > } > else > drm_set_pages_array_wc() > { > } > #endif > > Maybe in drm_cache.h? We do have a bunch of this in drm_cache.h already, and architecture maintainers hate us for it. The real fix is to get at the architecture-specific wc allocator, which is currently not something that's exposed, but hidden within the dma api. I think having this stick out like this is better than hiding it behind fake generic code (like we do with drm_clflush, which defacto also only really works on x86). Also note that ttm has the exact same ifdef in its page allocator, but it does fall back to using dma_alloc_coherent on other platforms. -Daniel > Best regard > Thomas > > > + > > shmem->pages = pages; > > return 0; > > @@ -203,6 +212,11 @@ static void drm_gem_shmem_put_pages_locked(struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem) > > if (--shmem->pages_use_count > 0) > > return; > > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86 > > + if (shmem->map_wc) > > + set_pages_array_wb(shmem->pages, obj->size >> PAGE_SHIFT); > > +#endif > > + > > drm_gem_put_pages(obj, shmem->pages, > > shmem->pages_mark_dirty_on_put, > > shmem->pages_mark_accessed_on_put); > > > > -- > Thomas Zimmermann > Graphics Driver Developer > SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH > Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany > (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) > Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer > -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx